Self-proclaimed computer “theorists” are not going to resolve the P, nP debate. They recklessly fit math to their needs, but they don’t immerse themselves in the artelegance of, well of life primarily, but also of math…and beauty and love and (sex, drugs, music, literature, film, (safe) sex, (safe-ish) drugs, CREATIVITY). Computers exist because of a priori mathematical theory and its discovery. The representations in the minds of a Riemann (mid-19th century) or an Einstein (early-mid 20th) or a Poincare (in between the two with some overlap)…all pre-binary-brainwashing, transcend this computer-centric bullshit mindset. We are allowing ourselves, and teaching our children, that it is ideal to think like a binary computer. Yet have you ever seen a binary computer play and laugh with another binary computer? Have you ever spent a few moments of your precious time thinking about why and how your own brain works? Give it a try, this isn’t school, there are no judgements in your head other than those you impose on yourself, and when you get your brain thinking about itself (because somewhere in our brains is the capacity for self-analysis on some level) you gain a sort of self-sustaining inspiration…

…think about the implications: the human brain (more on brains soon) is capable of letscullit complex learning or synthesis: the ability to create representations based on information collected through measurements and interactions (SENSE-A+tional) with the field(s) locally at a spacetimepoint coupled with this supersense of the complex-dimensional flow between spacetimepoints over the Maniversalfold allowing dynamic, iterative adjustment to replications for fine-tuning our representations, bringing us to the ultimate superpower: interactions between the representations: these have been called analogies, though the algebra on these interactions and the structure this algebra provides is much more complex than a simple notion of analogy. (Remember though: the thesis of this blog in one form is the assertion that unity constructs complexity, so if we know the underlying structure and define operations, complexity is in our control or at least not outside the realm of our understanding.) These interactions are closed at any local point in the brainifold embedded in spacetimanifold.

Here’s a Big Deal: because everything within our closed human body system comes from a shared origin, every thing in this everything can now become an origin, and all of this everything is connected with scalar invariance and stored in our DNA. This allows the deep fine structure (long-term memory, complex thought, abstraction of infinity…) to bypass the local speed of light constraint using entanglement to make associations and representational interactions independent of the embedding metric space or manifold. We are unity.

Life is not binary it is unitary, and this makes all the difference. There is no zero=nothingness. Many academics don’t even conceptualize P, nP properly despite writing endless academicky, voiceless, directionless, useless articles to give to some mysterious review bored (already?) to determine whether the writing adheres to a well-defimplied antistyle: like a very logically gifted unloved and unloving solipsistic sexually repressed scared to death of dying manchild (occasionally womanchild)…afraid of his own voice. Furthermore, this board of bores decides if said style sufficiently shields the proof of purposeful meaning proposed henceforth whatever…I don’t even know what, honestly, because what’s the big fucking deal if a brilliant paper has minor flaws.

The mistake of not allowing iterations; the universe abides by trial and error and incremental adjustment. Why would Time exist otherwise? Many “unsolved” problems are trying to prove the same thing, which is ironic because why waste all this effort to prove what is already proven, but I suppose that is mankind’s biggest weakness. Yet weaknesses are only strengths used inefficiently.

Life is an open string: it is time it is consciousness it is awareness that there is no nothingness there only IS because WE ARE HERE… so as to tie up any loose strings life is double covered by birth and death, so if birth exists and death exists, then they must be united in the sense of our ongoing investigation into unity? But how do I prove that a singularity at the origin or at a point because the origin is any point and any point can be the origin, or that all origins are the same yet all origins are different because they are infinitely generative, but that at any point in all of this will language suffice to explain why…?

There are two realities one in which everything I am saying is true and everything is united at the origin or an origin any origin will do just give it some time and observe to see the evidence but if you in all your human glory rahrah whoopdeedoo look how good we are at taking a basis B for Beauty or Being at observing symmetry not just any old symmetry the only symmetry that counts lets call it S for Superyay! duality or mirror symmetry if I have one representation M for Myself and am given the World W then I can either stand there admiring myself in an infinite mirror of nothingness or I can compare it to any and all possible other representations to prove that I exist separate but equally deserving of knowledge as U exist U for you or unity or opening the closure which is easy the hard part is closing the opening but that’s only hard if you want it to be hard because the neatness of existence is that there are infinite ways to close an opening though why would you want to? and here’s the twist: At every closure there is an opening you go one way I’ll go the other I won’t tell anyone you were here if you don’t etc etc it doesn’t matter no everything matters the inverse of everything is everything

-BB